- Published on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:51
- Written by Recto Mercene and Max V. de Leon / Reporters
A top
United Kingdom official broadly suggested on Tuesday that the
Philippines could take off faster if it considered privatization but
with the government still playing an important role as a judicious
regulator.
Hugo
Swire, visiting minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth
Office, cited the UK’s economic transformation after it elected to
privatize.
Britain,
Swire said, is now a success story in Europe because it opted for
privatization in the late 1970s after struggling against uncompetitive
“smokestack” industries, strikes by labor organizations and related
human problems.
He
offered the reason for the feat, at the same time saying that he sees
his country’s dilemma almost 40 years ago as also being faced by the
Philippines now.
According
to Swire, a big lesson that they learned from their experience is that
businessmen are better economic managers than bureaucrats.
“Businesses
run businesses better than government does. The government, despite its
very best intentions, is not there to run business, the government is
there to enable business…to make sure that investors and people are
protected,” he said.
Swire added that, ultimately, the government ought to run infrastructure such as railways, hospitals or airports.
When
asked on the Aquino administration’s Public-Private Partnership (PPP)
Program, Swire said, “I think your government is looking at this, I
think it’s right to be cautious and look at the progress made in other
countries.”
Despite
his apparent warning, he still urged the Philippine government to
seriously consider its PPP Program, since “this is the best way forward
for your economy and that is the No. 1 consideration.”
Looking
back at his own country before it embarked on privatization, Swire said
that Britain at the time was in a “winter of discontent,” when “[it]
was a deeply humiliating time to be British.”
When also asked if the government should regulate business, he replied that there has to be a balance.
“
You can’t have no regulation, they [businesses] have to be regulated
properly, but, on the other hand, your business can suffer from
overregulation,” Swire said.
He added that in the United Kingdom, they are cutting red tape.
“There
are far too many regulations on business, but certainly whether it is
schools or hospitals, railways and airports, they don’t need regulations
because they are essential services and essential services need to be
protected,” Swire said.
But,
according to him, these social and economic arms should not necessarily
be run by the government because the job could be done by commercial
organizations.
Swire
said the Philippines is heading down the same path—as Britain was
nearly four decades ago—that is seemingly spiked with corruption,
insufficient infrastructure, fragile peace and protectionism.
Corruption, he added, remains a scourge in the global economy.
“It
adds as much as 10 percent to the total cost of doing business globally
and up to 25 percent to the cost of procurement contracts in developing
countries,” Swire said.
Good infrastructure, he added, could provide foundations for long-term prosperity.
Peace and stability, Swire said, “perhaps are the most crucial platform for prosperity.”
He suggested that the Philippines shun protectionism and embrace free trade instead.
In
pushing the government to pursue the PPP Program, Swire said the United
Kingdom is committed to support the program in terms of both policy
know-how and investments in actual projects.
He told the BusinessMirror
that a number of British companies are eager to invest in the
Philippines and are only waiting for the government to put together good
PPP packages.
Swire said the country remains as a top priority for UK investments in the region.
“As
we say, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. The single largest
European investor in the Philippines has been [the UK] and will remain
[so]. There are already British businesses here and there are many
others who are looking at the opportunity to break into the market. If
the government takes the PPP route, more UK firms will be coming in,” he
added.
Britain
is also sharing its experience on PPP as a privatization tool because,
Swire said, this is a good way to get more private participation and
improve the delivery of services to the people.
“It’s
like what we did in the 1980s. We made some mistakes, but got it right
in other areas. We will share those mistakes and the way of getting it
right with your government,” he added.
The visiting UK official said that London will also share its policy experience in infrastructure development, energy and PPP.
Swire,
who is on a Southeast Asian official tour, added that it is the
intention of UK to increase its level of trade and investments with the
Philippines.
He
addressed a joint meeting of the Makati Business Club (MBC) and
Management Association of the Philippines at the Tower Club in Makati
City.
Swire
announced that he just signed a joint action plan with Foreign
Secretary Albert del Rosario that will take the two country’s relations
to a new level.
“This
is a genuinely exciting proposition. Our partnership will help to shape
the business environment, working together on issues like
anti-corruption, competitiveness, economic reform, a low-carbon economy
and building awareness about the opportunities for trade and
investment,” he said.
Swire
also announced the signing of a new air-services agreement between him
and Transportation Secretary Joseph Emilio Abaya, and met with Ramon Ang
of Philippine Airlines, which is hoping to start direct flights to
London soon.
He
also urged the Philippines to conclude a free-trade agreement with the
European Union as “international trade and investment is the best route
to development.”
Ramon
del Rosario Jr., MBC chairman, said that the Philippines enjoys a trade
surplus with the UK. Also, as of first half of the year, UK investments
in the Philippines had reached P1.47 billion, surpassing the full-year
2011 total of P1.38 billion.
No comments:
Post a Comment